Lonely Nation
Isolated Americans trying to connect
By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK - In bleak nursing homes and vibrant college dorms, in crowded cities and spread-out suburbs, Americans confront an ailment with no single cause or cure.Some call it social isolation or disconnectedness. Often, it's just plain loneliness.
An age-old ailment, to be sure, and yet by various measures — census figures on one-person households, a new study documenting Americans' shrinking circle of intimate friends — it is worsening.
It seems ironic, even to those who are affected. The nation has never been more populous, soon to reach the 300 million mark. And it has never been more connected — by phone, e-mail, instant message, text message, and on and on.
Yet so many are alone in the crowd.
"People are increasingly busy," said Margaret Gibbs, a psychologist at Fairleigh Dickinson University. "We've become a society where we expect things instantly, and don't spend the time it takes to have real intimacy with another person."
Some Americans are making a new commitment, getting reconnected in groups or one-on-one and combatting a phenomenon that can take a heavy toll on communities and individuals.
In its most pronounced forms, loneliness is considered a serious, even life-threatening condition, heightening the risks of heart disease and depression. A sense of isolation can strike at almost any age, in any demographic sector — parents struggling to adjust to empty-nest status, divorcees unable to rebuild a social life, even seemingly self-confident college students.
John Powell, a psychologist at the University of Illinois counseling center, says it's common for incoming freshmen to stay in their rooms, chatting by computer with high school friends rather than venturing out to get-acquainted activities on campus.
"The frequency of contact and volume of contact does not necessarily translate into the quality of contact," Powell said.
The trend toward isolation surfaced in the last U.S. census figures, which show that one-fourth of the nation's households — 27.2 million of them — consisted of just one person, compared to 10 percent in 1950.
In June, an authoritative study in the American Sociological Review found that the average American had only two close friends in whom they would confide on important matters, down from an average of three in 1985. The number of people who said they had no such confidant soared from 10 percent in 1985 to nearly 25 percent in 2004; an additional 19 percent said they had only one confidant — often their spouse.
"That may be the most worrisome thing," said Lynn Smith-Lovin, a Duke University sociologist who co-authored the study. "If you lose that one person, because the relationship declines or the person dies, you have no one to support you. If we're all becoming more dependent on our spouse or partner for that kind of complete knowing of each other, we're all vulnerable to losing that."
"Bowling Alone" was prophecy, not speculation. I'm grateful to the Wiki partners for the good friends they've become.
Comments
In today's sermon our minister told us that people with 5 or more good friends are 50% more likely to self-report being happy as those who have less than 5 good friends.
He also mentioned studies have shown that having more money makes people happier, but only up to $50,000 combined household income.
People living with less become progressively happier as income increases. However, beyond $50,000 additional income does NOT correlate with increased happiness.
This reminded me of something I read 40 years ago in "The Tyranny of Words" by Stuart Chase.
Paraphrasing Chase: after a person's basic needs for food, water, shelter and safety are met, three things are required to live a fulling life:
Something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.
Posted by: Mark | August 6, 2006 03:31 PM